This report describes results from vessel surveys and visual species-verification trials conducted at the Jacksonville Shallow Water Training Range (JSWTR) in the Jacksonville Operating Area (OPAREA). This work continues from a multi-institutional monitoring program intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density, and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

A total of 23 nearshore and mid-shelf vessel surveys were completed during the 2023/24 field season. In total, 43 baleen whale sightings, including 33 sightings of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) composed of 43 individuals, 6 sightings of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) composed of 9 individuals (1 deceased), 3 sightings of minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) composed of 3 individuals, and 1 sighting of a fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) composed of 1 individual occurred during the 2023/24 field season.

During HDR Inc.’s 2023/24 field season, baleen whale sightings included humpback whales, NARWs, fin whales, minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), and sei whales (Balaenoptera borealis). This report will focus on the photo-ID results from all baleen whale sightings, photogrammetry results from the drone, and status of the MAHWC and Happywhale matching. See Aschettino et al. (2025) and Engelhaupt et al. (2025) for further information and details from the vessel survey and tagging efforts, and Ozog and Engelhaupt (2025) for details from the supporting aerial surveys.

A total of 22 nearshore and mid-shelf vessel surveys were completed during the 2024/25 field season. In total, 60 baleen whale sightings, including 40 sightings of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) totaling 59 individuals, 10 sightings of North Atlantic right whales (NARWs; Eubalaena glacialis) totaling 22 individuals, 7 sightings of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) totaling 14 individuals, and 3 sightings of individual minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), occurred during the 2024/25 field season. A total of 24 aerial surveys were flown during the 2024/25 field season in association with this effort and the Offshore Cetacean Study (OCS) (A. Engelhaupt et al. 2026); see Ozog and Engelhaupt 2026 for additional details regarding the aerial surveys. Baleen whale sightings from the aerial surveys included humpback (n=45), NARWs (n=8), fin (n=11), and minke (n=3) whales (Ozog and Engelhaupt 2026). During the OCS surveys, baleen whale sightings included fin whales (n=12), humpback whales (n=7), a blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus; n=1), a minke whale (n=1), and an NARW (n=1) (A. Engelhaupt et al. 2026). Across this project and the OCS effort, satellite-linked telemetry tags were deployed on one humpback whale, one fin whale, and one NARW. Customized Animal Tracking Solution tags were deployed on two NARWs and two humpback whales. One biopsy sample was collected from the satellite-tagged humpback whale.

Effects of mixed-species associations (MSA [at least two different species swimming together and / or inte racting]) on cetacean behavior rarely have been quantified, but are important for identifying and differentiating potential anthropogenic impacts . Baseline marine mammal behavior was assessed during 83 ,005 km of U.S. Navy supported aerial line-transect surveys in the Southern California Bight during 2008-2013.

This study investigates mixed-species associations among marine mammals in the Southern California Bight, focusing specifically on Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus). Over a six-year period, aerial surveys were conducted to record the frequency and nature of these associations, revealing that Risso's dolphins were the most commonly observed species in mixed interactions. The results indicate a significant decline in the proportion of Risso's dolphins involved in such associations compared to historical records, possibly due to an increase in their relative abundance. The findings underline the importance of monitoring mixed-species associations to understand marine mammal dynamics and ecological interactions.

Three subsurface passive acoustic moorings were deployed in the western Gulf of Alaska on the EcoFOCI fall mooring cruise onboard the F/V Aquila 15 Aug – 14 Sep 2023; recovery is planned for September 2024, funding permitting. These mooring will allow investigation into the seasonal occurrence of many species of vocalizing marine mammals including North Pacific right (NPRW), blue, fin, humpback, minke, gray, sperm, killer, and beaked whales, Dall’s and harbor porpoise, general pinniped sounds, and anthropogenic noise sources such as vessels and seismic airguns. This is important data that the Navy needs to prepare environmental planning documentation, including those for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and ESA documents and consultations. It is also needed to inform the National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Regional Office’s NPRW critical habitat expansion decision. In addition to the field work, processing of existing passive acoustic recordings from three moorings in the WGOA is ongoing, with one site (Barnabus Trough) completed for the high-frequency band. Killer whale vocalizations were detected on 214 of the 358 days with recordings.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Alaska Fisheries Science Center has maintained passive acoustic recorder moorings in areas of interest to the US Navy in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). Archival data from three of these sites were analyzed for the timing and occurrence of key cetacean species. In addition, three subsurface passive acoustic moorings were deployed for a year (fall 2023 to fall 2024) in areas of mutual interest to NOAA and the Navy. Two of these new moorings, located along the western GOA slope, were redeployed in 2024.

The Hawaiian Islands Cetacean and Ecosystem Assessment Survey (HICEAS) is a recurring ship-based, line-transect survey designed to estimate cetacean abundance in the entirety of the Hawaiian EEZ.

In order to further investigate potential changes in behavior in response to MFAS exposure, sounds of marine mammals were recorded in the vicinity of three U.S. Navy training exercises before, during, and after the use of MFAS in Onslow Bay, North Carolina (July 2008), and near Jacksonville, Florida (September–October, and December 2009). The resulting passive acoustic data were analyzed using automated signal-detection software to detect individual sonar transmissions (“pings”), and sounds of North Atlantic right, minke, fin, and sperm whales. In addition, putative right whale “gunshot” sounds that had been detected in an earlier, separate analysis of the Jacksonville recordings were reviewed by two experienced marine mammal acoustic analysts.

This project is intended to provide baseline information on the species composition, density, distribution, and basic behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present within the United States (U.S.) Navy’s Virginia Capes (VACAPES) Operating Area (OPAREA). This study is part of a larger, multi-institutional, marine mammal and sea turtle monitoring program of U.S. Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast and Gulf of Mexico supporting Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing (AFTT)

This report represents one facet of a collaborative multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in United States (U.S.) Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC) from September 14, 2012 until June 30, 2013. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at the shelf slope near Quinault Canyon. Data analysis methods consisted of detection of sounds by analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and by automated computer algorithms when possible. The data were divided into three frequency bands for analysis of marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex from December 2012 to January 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at three locations: near Santa Barbara Island (880 m), west of San Clemente Island (1000 m), and southwest of San Clemente Island (1300 m). Six baleen whale species were recorded: blue whales, Bryde’s whales, fin whales, gray whales, humpback whales, and minke whales.

To monitor for the presence of marine mammals, High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) were deployed at two sites within the Navy’s Virginia Capes Range Complex. There were three deployments at one site, located offshore from Cape Hatteras (HAT), between October 2012 and December 2014. There was one deployment at the other site, located offshore from Norfolk Canyon (NFC), between June 2014 and April 2015. Both sites were located approximately 75 nmi offshore in about 1000 m of water.

High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) were deployed from May 2013 to August 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex. The HARPs recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at a site located 60 nm east off the Florida coastline on the continental shelf. Technical malfunctions resulted in loss of data for the period from June 8, 2013 through February 16, 2014. Data analysis consisted of analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Three frequency bands were analyzed for marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds: (1) Low-frequency, between 10300 Hz, (2) Mid-frequency, between 10-5,000 Hz, and (3) High-frequency, between 1-100 kHz. Three baleen whale species were detected: fin whales, humpback whales, and minke whales. Fin whale detections were limited to February 2014. Humpback whale calls were detected from February to June 2014 with a peak in March 2014. Minke whales were detected in late-February through March 2014. An additional sound called the 5-pulse signal, presumably from a baleen whale, was detected from February to September 2014, with a peak in July. One known odontocete species was detected, Risso’s dolphins, which were detected in low numbers in July 2014. Odontocete signals that could not be distinguished to species were common throughout the recordings. However, eight distinct click types of unknown species origin were found to be present (CT 17, CT 22, CT 25, CT 26, CT 27, CT 27A, CT 30 and CT32). The following anthropogenic sounds were detected: broadband ship noise, Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar, and echosounders. Broadband ships were common throughout the recordings with a peak in detections in May 2014. MFA sonar was detected during all months with recordings, with a peak in June 2013. Echosounder pings were prevalent throughout the recordings.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted at two sites in the US Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex during August 2010 – July 2011. These sites are located 50 and 61 nm east of the Florida coastline on the shelf and shelf break at water depths of 40 m – 90 m. Acoustic data collected at these sites provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) documented sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with recording cycles of 5 minutes every 15 minutes. The data were divided into three frequency bands and data analysis was conducted with analyst scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms. Four mysticete whale species were recorded: fin, minke, sei, and humpback. No blue whale, North Atlantic right whale, or Bryde’s whale calls detected. A new call, designated the “5-pulse” was detected and is presumed to be produced by a mysticete whale due to its character, prevalence and intensity. Site A has more hours with calling mysticete whales than site B. However, humpback whale calls were detected only at site B, though these detections were few. The largest number of odontocete detections were attributed to unidentified odontocetes, thought to be primarily bottlenose and Atlantic spotted dolphins. Unidentified odontocetes were detected throughout the year. Overall numbers of detections were higher at site A than site B. There was a diel acoustic activity pattern with greater numbers of echolocation clicks produced at night, likely due to nighttime foraging. Risso’s dolphin echolocation clicks were only detected at site A and only occurred August through March. Five click types, yet to be associated to an odontocete species, were characterized and their seasonal and diel occurrence described. Ship noise was the most common anthropogenic sound at both sites A and B. Both sites had Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar events throughout the period of data collection. At site A, a total of 2,437 MFA sonar pings were detected with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 173 dB re 1 μPa. Similarly, a total of 2,496 MFA sonar pings were detected at site B, reaching a maximum peak-to-peak level of 166 dB re 1 μPa. Echosounder pings with a variety of primary frequencies (4 – 80 kHz) were found at both sites A and B. Explosions were recorded at both sites, though were more prevalent at site B. A low-frequency tone, referred to as the 130 Hz tone, was recorded at site A. High noise levels, possibly caused by instrument strumming and fluid flow at the sensor, occurred intermittently at both sites and likely decreased the detection range for low-frequency sounds.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2010 and February 2011 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site A in 90 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 153 days between 26 August 2010 and 25 January 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Risso’s dolphins, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data. A new call type, the “5-pulse” call, presumed to be produced by a mysticete, was also detected in the data.

Navy Research Funded Year Three Project Reports

In the Pacific, the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) program maintains systems that continuously run algorithms to detect, classify and localize marine mammals year-round on the U.S. Navy’s deep-water Southern California Antisubmarine Warfare Range (SOAR) in Southern California and the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i. Long-term archive data collected on these ranges allow for numerous types of studies on species inhabiting the ranges, including the monitoring of abundance, behavioral responses to naval activities, and habitat usage. They also provide the opportunity to study ambient sound levels and soundscapes.

Nine Marine Autonomous Recording Units (MARU’s) were deployed in a rectangular array at a site coinciding with the United States (U.S.) Navy’s planned Undersea Warfare Training Range (USWTR) approximately 60150 km offshore Jacksonville, FL (13 September to 8 October and 3 December to 8 January, 2009–2010) at shallow, mid-depth, and deep sites (45, 183, 305 m). Data were reviewed in detail using TRITON (Wiggins, 2007). Event logs were created for each day at every site. Custom-written MATLAB scripts were used to calculate the probability of minke whale vocalization events occurring in the presence and in the absence of mid-frequency sonar. Minke whale vocalization events were completely absent in the fall deployment period, but occurred almost continuously during the winter deployment, indicating a strong seasonal pattern of occurrence. Minke whale vocalizations were detected most frequently at deep-water sites, and only at low levels (

Autonomous acoustic recorders are effective for investigating the distribution, occurrence, and acoustic behaviors of a variety of marine mammals in remote and deep-water locations. Nine Marine Autonomous Recording Units (MARU’s) were deployed in a rectangular array at a site coinciding with the United States (U.S.) Navy’s planned Undersea Warfare Training Range (USWTR) approximately 60-150 kilometers offshore Jacksonville, FL. All 9 units were deployed for 26 days in fall (13 September to 8 October) and 37 days in winter (3 December to 8 January) 2009-2010 at shallow, mid-depth, and deep sites (45, 183, 305 meters). The timing of the deployments allowed recordings of cetacean vocalizations and sonar activity to be made before, during, and after two U.S. Navy training exercises. The goal of this study was to characterize minke whale vocal activity in relation to U.S. Navy mid-frequency sonar signals. Data were reviewed in detail using the MATLAB program Triton (Wiggins 2007). Event logs were created for each day at every site. Custom-written MATLAB scripts were used to calculate the probability of minke whale vocalization events occurring in the presence and in the absence of mid-frequency sonar. Minke whale vocalization events were completely absent in the fall deployment period, but occurred almost continuously during the winter deployment, indicating a strong seasonal pattern of occurrence. Minke whale vocalizations were detected most frequently at deep-water sites, but only at low levels (

We fitted hidden Markov models to 627 tracks that were reconstructed from 3 years of minke whale (B. acutorostrata) vocalizations recorded before, during, and after naval training events at the U.S. Navy’s Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, Hawaii. The fitted models were used to identify different movement behaviors and to investigate the effect of sonar activity on these behaviors. Movement was faster and more directed during sonar exposure than in baseline phases. The mean direction of movement differed during sonar exposure, and was consistent with movement away from sonar-producing ships. Animals were also more likely to cease calling during sonar.

The United States (U.S.) Navy routinely conducts training and testing activities in the Virginia Capes (VACAPES) Operating Area (OPAREA) off the mid-Atlantic and Southeast U.S. The region encompassing the deeper waters of the continental shelf, shelf break, and continental slope has been recognized as an important habitat for multiple species of cetaceans. Kenney and Winn (1986) showed that the shelf edge from Cape Hatteras to Georges Bank was the second most intensively used cetacean habitat off the northeastern U.S. based on 3 years of surveys conducted by the Cetacean and Turtle Assessment Program (CETAP 1982). This progress report includes all offshore monitoring activities conducted in 2021. The goals of this effort focus on addressing fundamental information gaps related to marine mammal occurrence, exposure, and response as identified by the U.S. Navy’s Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring Program (DoN 2010) and recommendations provided by a Scientific Advisory Group review (DoN 2011).

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions: • Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally? • What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area? • Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years? • What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes? • Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily move through areas of U.S. Navy live-fire or Anti-Submarine Warfare training events?

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

This report summarizes the aerial survey effort conducted at the JAX site from 2009 through 2017. The monitoring project was intended to provide information on the species composition, density, and spatial distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles present in Navy’s JAX operating area (OPAREA), with particular focus on the intended site of the USWTR. These aerial surveys extended over nine years and yielded a very detailed seasonal picture of the occurrence, distribution and abundance of marine mammals and sea turtles in the region. This work also provides an important baseline against which future changes in the marine mammal and sea turtle fauna can be assessed.

To monitor for the presence of marine mammals, a High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) recorded within the Navy’s Virginia Capes Range Complex, offshore from Cape Hatteras (HAT), between April 2015 and January 2016. The HAT site was located approximately 75 nm offshore in about 1000 m of water.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) was deployed from August 2014 to July 2015, with recordings made between August 2014 and May 2015, to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Jacksonville Range Complex. The HARP was located 83 nm off the Florida coastline on the continental slope.

This report presents the results of marine mammal monitoring for the Koa Kai 11‐1 training event, and represents the continued monitoring efforts under the U.S. Navy’s Marine Species Monitoring Program. The objectives of the vessel‐based monitoring effort for Koa Kai 11‐1 consisted of the following:  Perform focal behavioral follows of marine mammals during the course of a training event involving ASW. Assess the occurrence, distribution, and behavior of target species (marine mammals and sea turtles) using a vessel‐based line transect survey within the HRC in waters within or adjacent to the area where ships were training. Locate individual false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens), pygmy killer whales (Feresa attenuata), and short‐finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) tagged by Dr. Robin Baird with Cascadia Research. Investigate the occurrence, distribution, and behavior of target species (marine mammals and sea turtles) using vessel‐based line transect survey in waters within or adjacent to the area where Navy ships were training

In order to support the U.S. Navy in meeting regulatory requirements for monitoring established under the Final Rules and to provide a mechanism to assist with coordination of program objectives under the ICMP, this survey was conducted to confirm the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) acoustic detections and marine mammal satellite tagging was prior to a training event, the Submarine Commander’s Course exercise, which would be conducted in the same area during February 2012.This report presents the methods and preliminary results of a vessel-based visual and acoustic survey effort that was conducted in conjunction with a tagging and species-validation project

The overall objective of the ICMP is to assimilate relevant data collected across U.S. Navy range complexes in order to answer questions pertaining to the impact of MFAS and explosives on marine mammals and sea turtles.

The first phase to integrate the historical sum of these U.S. Navy-sponsored visual survey efforts for marine species monitoring in the HRC was prepared by Uyeyama (2011). This report represents the second phase of that effort and presents an overview of monitoring survey effort to date in the HRC. Available data from visual surveys performed by both contractor-led efforts and U.S. Navy in-house surveys was compiled and processed in order to: 1. Create a geographic information system (GIS)-based summation of all survey tracks that can be easily visualized. 2. Construct a geo-referenced database of sightings that can be queried by species, observer platform, Beaufort Sea State (BSS), season, or other sighting/survey variables. 3. Conduct an enhanced analysis of sighting success with respect to survey platform, field protocol, and environmental conditions. 4. Inform and adjust data collection procedures on future surveys as needed to reflect lessons learned from sighting data compilation efforts presented here. 5. Provide information to enhance informed management of marine protected species in the HRC and support the adaptive management process that is part of the ICM

Behavioral responses to sonar have been observed in a number of baleen whales, including minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata). Previous studies used acoustic minke whale boing detections to localize and track individual whales on the U.S. Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) in Kaua ‘i, Hawai‘i before, during, and after Navy training activities. These analyses showed significant changes in central North Pacific minke whale distribution and swimming behavior during Navy sonar events. For the purposes of contextualizing changes in animal movement relative to Navy sonar, we expanded on this research to examine the natural variation in minke whale movement when Navy sonar was not present. This study included 2,245 acoustically derived minke whale tracks spanning the years 2012–2017 over all months that minke whales were detected (October–May).

Minke whales were acoustically detected, localized, and tracked on the U.S. Navy's Pacific Missile Range Facility from 2012 to 2017. Animal source levels (SLs) were estimated by adding transmission loss estimates to measured received levels of 42 159 individual minke whale boings. Minke whales off Hawaii exhibited the Lombard effect in that they increased their boing call intensity in increased background noise. Minke whales also decreased the variance of the boing call SL in higher background noise levels. Although the whales partially compensated for increasing background noise, they were unable or unwilling to increase their SLs by the same amount as the background noise. As oceans become louder, this reduction in communication space could negatively impact the health of minke whale populations. The findings in this study also have important implications for acoustic animal density studies, which may use SL to estimate probability of detection.

Marine mammal surveys, initiated as part of the CalCOFI cruises in 2004, were continued during 2016-2017. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect survey protocol which includes two experienced observers scanning for marine mammals during transits between CalCOFI stations.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted at two sites in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during April 2010 – April 2011. These data provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High‐frequency acoustic recording packages documented sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with nearly continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M) and a site south of San Clemente Island (site N). For this reporting period, 8,099 hours of acoustic recordings were obtained from site M and 7,779 hours of recordings from site N. Data analysis methods consisted of analyst scans of long‐term spectral averages and spectrograms. The data were divided into three frequency bands and each band was analyzed for the sounds of marine mammal species or anthropogenic sources. Representative sounds are presented.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted using High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) deployed in waters offshore of Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida with support from the US Navy during 2016 - 2017. The HARPs recorded underwater sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz. Data analysis consisted of analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Three frequency bands were analyzed for marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds: (1) Lowfrequency, between 10-1000 Hz, (2) Mid-frequency, between 1,000-5,000 Hz, and (3) Highfrequency, between 1-100 kHz.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July 2010 and June 2011 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 216 days between 30 July 2010 and 3 March 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, North Atlantic right whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2012 and August 2013 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 853 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 250 days between 24 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes and mysticetes were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between March and October 2012 in the Cape Hatteras survey area at Site A in approximately 950 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 28 days between 15 March 2012 and 11 April 2012. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of fin whales, minke whales, beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2007 and May 2008 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 162 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes, with the exception of the period from January 1 – 16, 2008, when it recorded continuously due to an instrumentation malfunction, and recorded for 98 days between 10 October 2007 and 16 January 2008. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and February 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 108 days between 8 November 2009 and 24 February 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and April 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site C in 335 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 163 days between 8 November 2009 and 20 April 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, humpback whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July 2010 and February 2011 in Onslow Bay at Site D in 338 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 210 days between 30 July 2010 and 24 February 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2011 and July 2012 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 952 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 105 days between 19 August 2011 and 1 December 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, an unidentified beaked whale species, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, killer whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

The primary objectives of the passive acoustic 26 monitoring program are to: 1) Determine the patterns of occurrence at each monitoring site; 2) Compare patterns of occurrence to better understand distributional patterns; and 3) Document species-specific characteristics of the vocalizations of marine mammal species 30 in each area.

The U.S. Navy has been using High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) to conduct passive acoustic monitoring in waters offshore of Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida to determine patterns of occurrence and distribution of cetacean species and anthropogenic sounds since 2007. The datasets discussed in this annual report came from seven HARP deployments made from 2012 through 2016: one near Norfolk Canyon, off the coast of Virginia (982 meter [m] depth) between June 2014 and April 2015; four off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (850–980 m depths) between October 2012 and April 2016; and two off Jacksonville, Florida (800–806 m depths) between August 2014 and April 2016.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2014 and July 2015 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site D in 806 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 279 days between 23 August 2014 and 29 May 2015. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned manually for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Vocalizations of fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between June 2014 and April 2015 in Norfolk Canyon, VA, at Site A in 982 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 290 days between 19 June 2014 and 5 April 2015. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, possible Sowerby’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2012 and May 2013 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 970 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 212 days between 9 October 2012 and 9 May 2013. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May 2013 and March 2014 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 970 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 290 days between 29 May 2013 and 15 March 2014. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, possible Sowerby’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May 2014 and April 2015 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 850 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 217 days between 9 May 2014 and 11 December 2014. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between September 2009 and February 2010 in Jacksonville, FL, at Site A in 83 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 91 days between 16 September 2009 and 15 December 2009, at which point the hydrophone was damaged possibly from an animal bite. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 10 kHz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations and mid-frequency active sonar. Vocalizations of minke whales, Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between February and August 2010 in Jacksonville, FL, at Site A in 89 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 159 days between 22 February 2010 and 30 July 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 10 kHz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations and mid-frequency active sonar. Vocalizations of minke whales, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in Navy range complexes along the Atlantic coast. This program began in 2007, with baseline aerial and vessel surveys and a passive acoustic monitoring program in Onslow Bay, North Carolina and has since expanded to include study areas off Jacksonville, Florida and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. In Onslow Bay, six years of monitoring have yielded a comprehensive picture of the density, distribution and abundance of marine mammals and sea turtles and provided new insights into residency patterns among pelagic delphinid cetaceans in this region. More than four years of monitoring in Jacksonville have provided similar information on the density and distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles in this area. In Cape Hatteras, almost three years of surveys have provided preliminary information on the complex patterns of distribution and diversity of the marine mammals and sea turtles in this highly productive area. The current report builds on this past body of work and describes passive acoustic monitoring activities that occurred at these three sites between January and December 2013.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between February 2014 and August 2014 in the Jacksonville, FL, survey area at Site C in 88 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 188 days between 17 February 2014 and 23 August 2014. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs). Vocalizations of fin whales, minke whales, humpback whales, Risso’s dolphins, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data. A 5-pulse signal, previously described in the Jacksonville area, was also heard.

In October 2005, the U.S. Department of the Navy proposed the installation of an Undersea Warfare Training Range (USWTR) in one of four sites along the Atlantic coast, for the purpose of anti-submarine warfare training using mid-frequency tactical sonar (1-10 kilohertz [kHz]) in shallow waters. The initial preferred site for the USWTR was Onslow Bay, North Carolina.

A preliminary analysis of minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) acoustic behavior using data collected from Marine Acoustic Recording Units moored off Jacksonville, Florida in the fall and winter of 2009-2010 indicated that the duration of detected minke whale pulse trains was negatively influenced by the presence of Mid-Frequency Active Sonar (MFAS) activity. Other possible responses to MFAS include changes in characteristics of vocalizations, and movement away from the study area, which would result in a perceived change in vocal activity. Due to a low sample size, more data were needed to further investigate this potential change in vocal activity. Additional analysis was conducted by examining the occurrence and characteristics of minke whale pulse trains twenty-four hours before, during, and twenty-four hours after sonar activity. Acoustic data used for this analysis were collected in 2010-2012 with four High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) deployed off of Jacksonville, Florida, Onslow Bay, North Carolina, and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Periods of MFAS activity were detected and characterized using custom MATLAB® code (SonarFinder). Of the four datasets analyzed, two contained minke whale pulse trains that occurred before, during, and/or after periods of MFAS activity. Over 120 hours of recordings containing minke whale pulse trains from 49 encounters (a sequence of pulse trains with no more than 30 minutes between calls) were reviewed. Pulse trains were annotated and characterized by pulse train type (slow-down, speed-up, or constant), signal to noise ratio (SNR), and frequency range. Only pulse trains with an SNR of greater than 8dB were further analyzed to measure additional variables, including duration and pulse repetition rate. Our statistical analysis to assess changes in the occurrence and characteristics of minke whale pulse trains in relation to MFAS activity will provide insight into minke whale behavior and help guide the development of mitigation strategies for this species.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during March 2012 through December 2012 to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M), at a site west of San Clemente Island (site H), and a site southwest of San Clemente Island (site N).

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Mariana Islands Range Complex (MIRC) between 2 March and 27 April 2015 (data collection period: 6 March–7 April 2015). The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial distribution and temporal occurrence of odontocetes and mysticetes in offshore areas east of the Mariana Islands. The survey was essentially an exploration of offshore areas adjacent to Guam, Rota, Tinian, and Saipan. The areas east of the Mariana Islands are difficult to access and survey, and thus not much is known about the abundance and distribution of cetaceans in these offshore areas. Few dedicated marine mammal surveys have been conducted in these waters to date, and any additional effort improves the understanding and awareness of marine mammal occurrence in MIRC.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Mariana Islands Range Complex between 19 September and 14 November 2014. The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of odontocetes and mysticetes in offshore areas adjacent to Guam, Rota, Tinian, and Saipan.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Mariana Islands Range Complex between 19 September and 14 November 2014. The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of odontocetes and mysticetes in offshore areas adjacent to Guam, Rota, Tinian, and Saipan.

Ten bottom-mounted passive acoustic recorders have been deployed off the coast of Virginia beginning in July 2015 and was maintained for two years. A combination of high-frequency Autonomous Multichannel Acoustic Recorders (AMARs), and low-frequency Marine Autonomous Recording Units (MARUs) was deployed in two spatial configurations (Figure 1), with the AMARs in a linear array extending east from the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay across the continental shelf and MARUs deployed as a synchronized localization array within the WEA.

Ten bottom mounted passive acoustic recorders are deployed off the coast of Virginia and will be maintained for two years. A combination of high-frequency Autonomous Multichannel Acoustic Recorders (AMAR), and low-frequency Marine Autonomous Recording Units (MARU) was deployed in two spatial configurations with the AMARs in a linear array extending east from the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay across the continental shelf, and MARUs deployed as a synchronized localization array within the WEA.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) between 11 December 2014 and 26 January 2015. The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of odontocetes and mysticetes in offshore areas south of the Main Hawaiian Islands. The survey was essentially an exploration of offshore seamounts and adjacent abyssal areas.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted off the Kona, Hawaii, coast between 16 and 26 March 2010. This glider survey was conducted with funding from the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Research; awards # N00014-10-1-0515 and # N00014-08-1-1082. The survey was part of the development effort of the passive-acoustic Seaglider. The purpose of this field trial was primarily to test the general functionality of the passive-acoustic monitoring (PAM) board and a new onboard acoustic data-storage system (Revision A).

A long-term passive acoustic monitoring program was initiated in 2011 by the United States Navy Pacific Fleet to investigate the occurrence of cetaceans in waters within the main Hawaiian Islands under the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) monitoring plan. As a part of this monitoring plan, four ecological acoustic recorders (EARs) were deployed at locations around the islands of Ni‘ihau and Kaua‘i, to the west of Kaua‘i. These EARs recorded data over three deployment periods: July to December 2011, January to May 2012, and July 2012 to February 2013. They were programmed to record at a sampling rate of 80 kilohertz (kHz) with a duty cycle of 30 seconds “on” either every 5 or 10 minutes, depending on the deployment.

This report provides information relative to marine mammals at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) before, during and after the Feb 2011 Submarine Commanders Course exercise (SCC) between 11 and 22 Feb 2011.

This report provides passive acoustic evidence of the presence of beaked and minke whales on the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) instrumented acoustic range (BSURE and BARSTUR) before and after the Feb 2010 Submarine Commanders Course training event (SCC).

This report documents Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Pacific marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2021 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i.

This report documents Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific (NIWC Pacific) marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2020 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, Hawaii.

This report documents Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific (NIWC Pacific) marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2019 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, Hawaii.

This report documents SSC Pacific marine mammal monitoring efforts in FY16 for COMPACFLT at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), including during U.S. Navy mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS) training.

This report documents Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific (SSC Pacific) marine mammal monitoring efforts in FY15 for COMPACFLT at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, Hawaii, including during U.S. Navy mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS) training.

Minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) were acoustically detected and localized, via their boing vocalizations, using recorded data from the US Navy’s Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) located off Kauai, Hawaii. All available recorded data (766 h) from 24 seafloor mounted hydrophones were processed to localize boing calling minke whales associated with US Navy training events which occurred in the month of February over three years (2011–2013).

This report documents the Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Pacific Whale Acoustic Reconnaissance Project (WARP) Laboratory’s marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2023 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i.

This report documents Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific (SSC Pacific) marine mammal monitoring efforts in FY15 for COMPACFLT at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kauai, Hawaii, including during U.S. Navy mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS) training. Data products (both recorded hydrophone data and standard PMRF range products) were obtained and analyzed. Collaborative efforts with R. Baird and B. Southall were also performed involving estimating received levels for tagged animals that were exposed to MFAS during training activities.

This report documents SSC Pacific marine mammal monitoring efforts in FY16 for COMPACFLT at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), including during U.S. Navy mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS) training. Data products (i.e., recorded hydrophone data, standard PMRF range products, and range craft deployed calibrated hydrophone data) were obtained and analyzed using custom detection, classification and localization tools described herein.

This report documents Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific (NIWC Pacific) marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2022 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kaua'i, Hawai